This horrifying display of "lack-of-conference" or any productive criticism for that matter is in direct contrast to chapter 14 on conferences. I think if you are a teacher (especially a high school literature and writing teacher) and you will be grading students' papers, you need to know why you are giving them the grade they are receiving and what exactly they can do to improve the paper. My freshmen (in college) literature professor understood this well and would meet with each students over coffee at least once in the middle of the semester to talk about our papers and what we could do to improve. I am sure this took a lot of her time, but it was far more productive to us students as developing writers, even at the college level. Like the book said, it not only helps us (or our students) grow as writers when we confer, it shows them that we care about them and take their work seriously.
In chapter 15 I love what is says about why we need to talk about our writing. It shows the students that their writing is valuable and it is encouraging to hear student responses as we develop a piece of writing. It is so true that the students have so much to learn from each other. So many times I will think I am hitting the nail on the head with a writing assignment (or any assignment for that matter) and as soon as I share with others and hear about their work, I realize I need to tweak something, or am inspired to change something of mine. I have to admit that even when I am slightly timid to share what I write sometimes, I also tend to get excited at the prospect of getting feedback and support from my classmates.
I cannot tell you how many times I am in the classroom during writing time and a student will raise their hand, I will come over and they will just look up at me, then at their paper and sit there. At first I was confused but now I realize they just want me to read what they have written and tell them what I think. They are even open for corrections. I love this because it shows they are not afraid of their mistakes and are proud of their work.
In chapter 17 I love the idea of asking our students questions we don’t necessarily already know the answer to in order to show them that they have the answers and we take them seriously as writers and as students. I love this quote from page 213, "You have questioned the student into believing he has an answer to this, and when you get behind the answer, the student is able to build an identity for himself around this answer". Haha so cool, I never thought about it this way!
As a last note, I agree that it is important to have the teacher, classmates and the writer him or herself evaluate the writing of each individual. While students do know their writing the best, as instructors it is our job to keep them in the right direction and we know where their writing should be. As for the peers, it is good for them to see other writing at their level and learn to give positive criticism.
I love your example from your students, how they are raising their hands to share with you and get some feedback. Sounds like you have some conferences to conduct!
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, your bad teaching example was pretty ugly to read. It is interesting when I think about assessment, how some self-assessment balance would have helped. What a mess.
I think receiving support and feedback from our peers is a key part of sharing. I know I learn from listening and hearing what others have to say.